I think you misunderstood me.
Quote:
I'm also surprised by your point that Norn didn't have a grammar, lexicon, phonology.. how could it not???
I didn't mean that norn didn't have any grammar. Of course it cannot be. All languages have grammar. I meant that we actually don't know the
whole system of norn. Isn't it ? Some things are lost. And that's why you are "reconstructed" it.
Quote:
I doubted anyone would be interested in it
It interests me... But I think this sentence answers to my question. And I think I do better understand your project than before. I though nynorn is a kind of normalized language based on reconstructed norn. It would suppose that there is a work on norn reconstruction, and a second work on normalization.
But, I realise that this project is maybe more a normalization than a reconstruction. And in that way, it's maybe more a "construction". Do you understand what I mean ? In the same way as finnish language is a "constructed" language on a dialectal base.
Am I right ?