NORN KJOKL http://nornlanguage.x10.mx/phpBB3/ |
|
Scots influence http://nornlanguage.x10.mx/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Lundtrollinn [ Fri Jul 01, 2011 7:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Scots influence |
Quote: Our task is only to get rid of some superficial influences that Norn experienced from Scots I think I don't really understand the problem. It's said in the website, that for exemple forms -andi and -ing will be used instead of -in. But do these forms occur in norn corpus ? If not, and even if they are from a scots influence, why not to conserve them in Nynorn ? I wander two options. 1. some forms of norn language use -andi and -ing. But that's not said on the page "introduction". Therefore, it's not evident. 2. The aim is to construct a language as near as possible to modern scandinavian languages. Which of these options is right ? The first ? |
Author: | Hnolt [ Fri Jul 01, 2011 8:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Scots influence |
Lundtrollinn wrote: It's said in the website, that for exemple forms -andi and -ing will be used instead of -in. But do these forms occur in norn corpus ? If not, and even if they are from a scots influence, why not to conserve them in Nynorn ? Yes, they do occasionally occur in the Norn corpus: drillandi: http://nornlanguage.x10.mx/index.php?shet_gram#e5 klovandi: http://www.shetlanddialect.org.uk/historical (this text will be placed on our webpage soon) The words in -ing are preserved in the ballad of Hildina (eulingin < ǫðlingrinn, Drotnign < drottningrinn, and there's certainly a few more examples in Jakobsen's dictionary I can't show now). Quote: I wander two options. 1. some forms of norn language use -andi and -ing. But that's not said on the page "introduction". Therefore, it's not evident. 2. The aim is to construct a language as near as possible to modern scandinavian languages. I decided to go for an archaic version of Nynorn, close to the language of the ballad of Hildina and the Lord's Prayer. In the beginning I tried different variants, including more "modern" and more "Scottified", but when the overall picture started taking shape, I decided to do what I've done, mostly because I wanted to have a system in the grammar and that was the only way it seemed to work.
Which of these options is right ? The first ? |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |